Letter 144: (Verianus, a citizen of Nazianzus, had been offended by his son-in-law, and on this account wished his daughter to sue for a divorce. Olympius referred the matter to the Episcopal arbitration of S. Gregory, who refused to countenance the proceeding, and writes the two following letters, the first to the Prefect, the second to Verianus himself.) ...
Haste is not always praiseworthy. This is why I have delayed my reply until now on the matter of the daughter of the most honorable Verianus — partly to allow time to work its own correction, and partly because I suspect that Your Goodness does not actually favor the divorce, seeing that you entrusted the inquiry to me, knowing perfectly well that I am neither hasty nor reckless in such matters.
I have therefore held back until now, and not, I think, without reason. But since the allotted time is nearly spent and you need to know the result of my examination, I will tell you: the young woman appears to be of two minds, divided between reverence for her parents and love for her husband. Her words take her parents' side; her heart, I rather think, is with her husband — as her tears make plain. You will do what seems right to your own justice, and to God who guides you in all things. I would most willingly have given my opinion to my son Verianus that he should set much of this aside and not pursue the divorce — which is entirely contrary to our law, though the Roman law may determine otherwise. Justice must be upheld — which I pray you may always both affirm and carry out.
Human translation - New Advent (NPNF / ANF series)
Latin / Greek Original
Original text not yet available in this corpus.
This letter still needs a Latin or Greek source-text backfill. The source link, when available, is preserved so the text can be checked and added later.
View sourceRevision history
- 2026-03-20v2.1.0-import
Initial corpus import from New Advent / NPNF.
Fields: letter text, metadata, source links. Source: https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3103c.htm
Related Letters
Jerome's reply to the foregoing. For the second and fourth questions he refers Damasus to the writings of Tertullian, Novatian, and Origen. The remaining three he deals with in detail.
Your insult did not go unnoticed, my dear Magnus -- though you certainly hoped it would.
David is Scripture's great case study in the coexistence of greatness and sin.
Rufinus, a Roman Presbyter (to be carefully distinguished from Rufinus of Aquileia and Rufinus the Syrian), had written to Jerome for an explanation of the judgment of Solomon 1 Kings 3:16-28. This Jerome gives at length, treating the narrative as a parable and making the false and true mothers types of the Synagogue and the Church. The date of ...
As far as I can tell, what I whisper in your ear you proclaim from the rooftops [Matthew 10:27].